In the midst of the annual announcements for the esteemed Nobel Prize recipients from various fields, some of you may or may not have heard of the less coveted but quite public Ig Nobel Prize.
If venue serves as benchmark of prestigiousness,…
Courtesy nobelprize.org
While the Nobel Prize is given to "who have completed outstanding research, invented ground-breaking techniques or equipment or made an outstanding contribution to society in physics, chemistry, literature, peace and medicine or physiology" (Wikipedia- Nobel Prize), the Ig Nobel prize are awarded, to also quote from Wikipedia: for ten achievements that "first make people laugh, and then make them think." (Wikipedia- Ig Nobel Prize)
…is Ig Nobel as eminient as Nobel?

Courtesy improbable.com
An example of genuine scientific achievement given credit includes a finding that a black hole fulfils the technical requirements of accommodating Hell. Of course, we still wouldn’t know if you would literally go straight to Hell when you die by being killed as you approach a singularity.
In case you think it’s just a crackpot event, not quite. It’s been gaining quite a following since its inception. In fact, the renowned journal Nature hails it as "arguably the highlight of the scientific calendar."
Anyways, on with this year’s roll call of honours. Presented at Harvard University’s resplendent Sanders Theatre (its new venue instead of MIT) this year’s Ig Nobel Prizes are nothing ‘unusual’. Let’s see the 5 most interesting ones (out of 10 ranked based on how ‘ig’ it is personally).
No. 5
NUTRITION: Wasmia Al-Houty of Kuwait University and Faten Al-Mussalam of the Kuwait Environment Public Authority, for showing that dung beetles are finicky eaters.
Um, looks like there’s some shit that are better than others after all. But sorry, all shit is not yummy to me.
REFERENCE: "Dung Preference of the Dung Beetle Scarabaeus cristatus Fab (Coleoptera-Scarabaeidae) from Kuwait," Wasmia Al-Houty and Faten Al-Musalam, Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 35, no. 3, 1997, pp. 511-6.
No.4
ORNITHOLOGY: Ivan R. Schwab, of the University of California Davis, and the late Philip R.A. May of the University of California Los Angeles, for exploring and explaining why woodpeckers don’t get headaches.
Being bird-brained isn’t so bad after all. Plus, they get to see more than us!
REFERENCE: "Cure for a Headache," Ivan R Schwab, British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 86, 2002, p. 843.
REFERENCE: "Woodpeckers and Head Injury," Philip R.A. May, Joaquin M. Fuster, Paul Newman and Ada Hirschman, Lancet, vol. 307, no. 7957, February 28, 1976, pp. 454-5.
REFERENCE: "Woodpeckers and Head Injury," Philip R.A. May, Joaquin M. Fuster, Paul Newman and Ada Hirschman, Lancet, vol. 307, no. 7973, June 19, 1976, pp. 1347-8.
No.3
MATHEMATICS: Nic Svenson and Piers Barnes of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization, for calculating the number of photographs you must take to (almost) ensure that nobody in a group photo will have their eyes closed.
Photographers, now you have a way to calculate how many photos you’ll need to take for group photos (and saving those poor people from having to be reflashed more than strictly necessary!).
REFERENCE: "Blink-Free Photos, Guaranteed," Velocity, June 2006,
No.2
PEACE: Howard Stapleton of Merthyr Tydfil, Wales, for inventing an electromechanical teenager repellent — a device that makes annoying noise designed to be audible to teenagers but not to adults; and for later using that same technology to make telephone ringtones that are audible to teenagers but not to their teachers.
We’ll be able to use the latter application immediately, but the former will have to wait for its turn 3-4 decades down the road for us to use. Technology is for both the young and the old after all.
REFERENCE: "Psychoacoustics of a Chilling Sound," D. Lynn Halpern, Randolph Blake and James Hillenbrand, Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 39,1986, pp. 77-80.
No.1
MEDICINE: Francis M. Fesmire of the University of Tennessee College of Medicine, for his medical case report "Termination of Intractable Hiccups with Digital Rectal Massage"; and Majed Odeh, Harry Bassan, and Arie Oliven of Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, for their subsequent medical case report also titled "Termination of Intractable Hiccups with Digital Rectal Massage."
Incidentally, another award related to faeces, this time about its source. The study recommended that "this manoeuvre should be considered in cases of intractable hiccups before proceeding with pharmacological agents" but honestly, would you really prefer the massage over drugs? Personally, I think I’ll just sit it out.
REFERENCE: "Termination of Intractable Hiccups with Digital Rectal Massage," Francis M. Fesmire, Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 17, no. 8, August 1988 p. 872.
REFERENCE: "Termination of Intractable Hiccups with Digital Rectal Massage,"
Majed Odeh, Harry Bassan, and Arie Oliven, Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 227, no. 2, February 1990, pp. 145-6. They are at the Department of Internal Medicine, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
REFERENCE: "Hiccups and Digital Rectal Massage," M. Odeh and A. Oliven, Archives of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 119, 1993, p. 1383.
That ends this post. For the complete list of winners and previous year’s ones go here. CNN has their own piece on Ig Nobel Prize 2006. You can go there and see how scientists both love and hate it.